

The Great Pyramid of Giza: Global Positioning Respecting Latitude: A Decisive SolutionKeith M. Hunter
In addressing the issue of the global location of the Great Pyramid of Giza, the very first point that one might consider is just how knowledgeable the ancients were about the true dimensions of the earth. At least as far back as “known antiquity”, there exist some good estimates as to the general size of the earth (e.g. Eratosthenes). That being said however, there is no surviving information at all dating back much earlier to the time of the construction of the Great Pyramid, that gives any explicit indication as to what value the builders assigned to the size of the planet.
The Critical Linkage From a very careful evaluation of the placement of the Great Pyramid of Giza set against the most advanced physical earth model of this present age  the WGS84 model, it would appear that there exists a most incredible mathematical linkage between the latitude placement of the structure, and none other than the value for the tropical year of the earth itself; one that, if indeed is actually representative of a governing principle by which the latitude placement of the structure was determined, forces one to accept that the ancient pyramid builders must have possessed an earth ellipsoid model comparable to the WGS84 itself. And moreover, that in the positioning of the structure globally – at least respecting latitude  they placed it almost precisely where they intended it to be, to an error of only a few dozen feet or so! In contrast then to the previously mentioned 30 degree northwards placement theory, or even the refraction placement theory, both of which entertain the suggestion that the builders may have adjusted the position of the Great Pyramid to place it on a solid foundation, this new approach holds to no such requirement.
In evaluating the Great Pyramid of Giza against the earth form, the primary values of the WGS84 earth model, including the global coordinates of the pyramid itself, are as follows:
WGS84 [1]:
The Proposed Intended Global Relation: As one will recall from the evaluation of the earth tropical year, it was shown via a set of proportional laws that the earth did at some point in the past increase its orbital period from one of 360 days per year, to one of 365.24218408 days per year. And that the critical ratio between the two values is as follows:
365.2421840 / 360 = 1.014561622
Bearing this fact in mind, it is most astounding to find that this very ratio, simply multiplied by 10, would appear to be the decisive factor that determined the latitudinal placement of the Great Pyramid. This is revealed when one takes the ‘small circle’ circumference of the earth at the latitude of the structure, and divides it by the elliptical arc length displacement (separation) from the pyramid and the equator. The following diagram details the relevant components:
Under the WGS84 earth model, with the latitude of the Great Pyramid of Giza set at 29:58:50.952 N, the following measures hold true: The circular ‘small circle’ circumference of the Earth at the latitude of the Great Pyramid = 110443685.33838 feet The elliptical arc length from the equator to the Great Pyramid = 10885784.94485 feet Therefore: 110443685.33838 / 10885784.94485 = 10.145679516… Compare with the ratio between the current earth tropical year and the ideal of 360 days, as noted previously: 365.2421840 / 360 = 1.014561622
As one can see, the ratio respecting the Great Pyramid is almost exactly 10 times the ratio of change for the earth tropical year; a relationship that is highly suggestive. However, in order to determine just how forceful the relationship is, one must calculate the level of discrepancy from an exact x10 value.
The Margin of Error of the Great Pyramid of Giza Assuming therefore the deliberate intention to globally site the Great Pyramid such that the small circle circumference of the earth at the latitude of the structure was exactly 10.14561622… (10 x 1.014561622…) times the elliptical arc length from the centre of the structure to the equator; then under the WGS84 model, the Great Pyramid itself would have to be situated at precisely 29:58:51.44895 N. If this were so, then the following would be true [4]: Circumference of the Earth at the latitude of the Great Pyramid = 110443505.6744 feet Arc length from the equator to the Great Pyramid = 10885835.1489 feet Therefore: 110443505.6744 / 10885835.1489 = 10.14561622… And, comparing the arc length component given above with that derived under a position of 29:58:50.952 N:
As one can see from the analysis then, the difference from a perfect x10 multiple of the earth tropical year increase is extremely low; such that were one to have positioned the Great Pyramid a mere 50 feet further to the north, then the correspondence would be exact. When one considers that the base line length of the structure itself is some 756 feet, one can easily see that the error is well ‘contained’ within the structure. In sum, one can therefore be highly confident that the specified ratio association was intended, and thus represents the governing principle that determined the latitude placement of the structure.
Conclusions With an acceptance of the ‘x10 tropical year increase’ theory of placement, one is led inexorably to certain very distinct conclusions regarding the Great Pyramid of Giza; all of which necessitate that the builders were a part of an extremely advanced civilisation. In brief, they are as follows: 1) The builders were fully knowledgeable as to the true dimensions of the earth and possessed an elliptical earth model at least as advanced as the WGS84 model. 2) The builders must have been familiar with advanced elliptical mathematics and algebra, in order to actually calculate the elliptical arc length up from the equator to the latitude as would give them the x10 tropical year ratio. 3) The builders would have also had to possess extremely fine mechanical instruments for sighting the global coordinates at which to construct the Great Pyramid. Essentially, not only would they have had to do the positional calculation ‘on paper’, they would have had to actually physically go to the spot they had determined should be the centre of the structure. 4) Perhaps the most intriguing conclusion, bearing in mind the precise nature of the mathematical relationship, is that the builders themselves would in all likelihood not have been ancient Egyptians at all. For indeed, the intention to employ the noted physical ratio forces one to admit that the ratio value itself singularly determined the latitude of the Great Pyramid of Giza, and that the builders may well have surveyed the entire longitudinal sweep of the small circles in both the northern and southern hemisphere upon land, as would give them the proscribed x10 ratio. In effect, a truly global civilisation would appear to have been responsible for the structure. The idea that it was conceived and built purely locally would seem to be extremely unlikely.
References [1] The Astronomical Almanac 2003. (2001) [2] Cathie, B. (1997) The Harmonic Conquest of Space, [3 & 4] The analyses of the earth with respect to the arc length measures, and the small circle circumference values as connect up to the Great Pyramid of Giza were conducted using the


